![]() 08/24/2016 at 09:16 • Filed to: Coffee talk | ![]() | ![]() |
Discuss.
![]() 08/24/2016 at 09:18 |
|
Agreed.
![]() 08/24/2016 at 09:19 |
|
Without a doubt. I like the look of the CTS coupe, but the ELR is simply gawgeous. I wish I could afford one, it would be a near perfect commuter for me or my wife.
![]() 08/24/2016 at 09:24 |
|
Yes, but neither of them actually looks good.
![]() 08/24/2016 at 09:24 |
|
Agree. ELR is a great looking car. Positive size, good lines. However
Reduce price by $30000 to be more in line with what buyers actually get
Continue to suffer sales slump that SUVs say ‘luxury’
Do not profit
Wish they had a path to success. Future ‘collector’ for sure.
![]() 08/24/2016 at 09:34 |
|
I don’t like the styling of either particularly but I’m inclined to agree nonetheless. The rear end on both is significantly too tall but with the ELR that is at least cohesive with the rest of the design. That badonkadonk just does not fit with the nose on the CTS.
ATS coupe looks good though, I’ll give them that.
![]() 08/24/2016 at 09:37 |
|
There is no discussion. My grandfather once served as an attorney and was well-known for the Arthur Conan Doyle-inspired expression “Never argue ascertainable facts."
![]() 08/24/2016 at 09:39 |
|
Wouldn't know. I've literally never seen an ELR on the road...they must have sold like <2 of them.
![]() 08/24/2016 at 09:46 |
|
CTS: Available with supercharged V8
ELR: Available 4 cylinder and a battery pack
R.I.P. in peace, ELR.
![]() 08/24/2016 at 09:48 |
|
I kinda don’t like the ELR. But the styling as a whole looks like it was supposed to be a coupe from the start instead of a sedan with a weird back half.
![]() 08/24/2016 at 09:53 |
|
Besides the point. The ELR looks better.
![]() 08/24/2016 at 09:55 |
|
It is completely the point. They’re cars, not paintings. You’re not going to spend all of your ownership experience staring at them.
![]() 08/24/2016 at 09:58 |
|
The point is that the the ELR looks better. That’s all. Not which is a better overall car.
![]() 08/24/2016 at 10:00 |
|
Related note: ATS coupe looks better than the CTS coupe.
Also, I agree about the ELR. Seriously wish those had taken off.
![]() 08/24/2016 at 10:00 |
|
I just find it silly that it has a Miata-small trunk opening, when the Volt it’s based on is a liftback.
![]() 08/24/2016 at 10:02 |
|
“The ELR Looks better. Discuss.”
“
But the CTS comes with better stuff.”
“STOP DISCUSSING IMMEDIATELY”
![]() 08/24/2016 at 10:21 |
|
Minus the clear FWD proportions.
![]() 08/24/2016 at 10:22 |
|
So you’re okay with buying a Youabian Puma? It certainly will bring an interesting ownership experience.
![]() 08/24/2016 at 10:26 |
|
Third point: the ATS coupe is the best proportioned.
![]() 08/24/2016 at 10:27 |
|
agreed. also, id get the LER for DD. yay cheap commuting
![]() 08/24/2016 at 10:28 |
|
Just food for thought, but you should have side by side pics of both cars as a reference, mainly because I’m lazy.
Alas, you are right and that is all that matters.
![]() 08/24/2016 at 10:29 |
|
Easily. The CTS coupe is probably the ugliest modern Cadillac. I’d rather be seen in a Cimarron.
On the other hand, the ATS coupe is quite attractive. I would absolutely rock one of those.
![]() 08/24/2016 at 10:30 |
|
Not more distinctive, though. In a time where you have to look twice or three times to tell what brand most cars are, the CTS coupe looks like no other car in the world.
![]() 08/24/2016 at 10:39 |
|
I just saw an ELR in person. Photos don’t really capture the ELR or the CTS accurately.
![]() 08/24/2016 at 10:41 |
|
The ELR is more Cadillac than the CTS.
![]() 08/24/2016 at 10:56 |
|
I’ve seen one in the wild. Good thing I had my seat belt on, or I would’ve fallen right out of my truck. They look absolutely stunning in person.
![]() 08/24/2016 at 11:00 |
|
This is like discussing which one of my dogs took the prettier shit this morning.
![]() 08/24/2016 at 12:21 |
|
Agreed. But I will accept that the CTS coupe racecar is mean AF
![]() 08/24/2016 at 20:10 |
|
Neither one of them is a looker, honestly. The ELR suffered from horrendous proportions, with a stubby minivan-like hood and front wheels pushed all the way back under the A-pillar; while the CTS Coupe had that big giant ass sticking up in the air.
The ATS, on the other hand, just about nails it.